Prediction of the intensity of postnatal hemolysis in newborns with hemolytic disease by the Rh-factor, who received intrauterine transfusion of donor erythrocytes

Abstract

Currently, intrauterine transfusion (IUT) is the standard of treatment for severe forms of fetal hemolytic disease (HDF). Owing to this method, in recent years, there has been a significant decrease in the incidence of severe forms of Rh-mediated hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN). It changes the HDF pathogenesis, allowing the continuation of the pregnancy, and besides this significantly affects the postnatal picture of the disease. In this connection it's necessary to determine the most informative predictors of the intensive postnatal hemolysis which would allow to predict the severity of HDN and choose the optimal neonatal treatment after IUTs. Literature analysis has shown that there are several criteria: antenatal (assessment of antibody cytotoxicity, amount of IUTs, bilirubin level at the last IUTs) and postnatal criteria (fetal hemoglobin fraction, reticulocytes level in peripheral blood, and direct Coombs' test after birth). The most informative and clinically available predictors are the fetal hemoglobin fraction of more than 40-50%, determined by Kleinhower-Betke test or an automatic blood analyzer; the reticulocyte count of >100x109 and a positive direct Coombs' test after birth.

Keywords:alloimmunization, red blood cell antibodies, Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn, fetal anemia, intrauterine transfusion, predictors of intensive hemolysis, fetal hemoglobin fraction, reticulocytes, direct Coombs' test, exchange transfusion

Funding. The study had no sponsor support.

Conflict of interest. Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Contribution. Review of publications on the topic of the article, text writing - Uretskaya E.V.; text writing, editing - Lenyushkina A.A.; review of publications on the topic of article - Uvarenkova P.A.; editing - Krogh-Jensen O.A.

For citation: Uretskaya E.V., Lenyushkina A.A., Uvarenkova P.A., Krogh-Jensen O.A. Prediction of the intensity of postnatal hemolysis in newborns with hemolytic disease by the Rh-factor, who received intrauterine transfusion of donor erythrocytes. Neonatologiya: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie [Neonatology: News, Opinions, Training]. 2021; 9 (4): 34-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33029/2308-2402-2021-9-4-34-41 (in Russian)

REFERENCES

1. Mari G., et al. Correlation between middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity and fetal hemoglobin after 2 previous intrauterine transfusions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193 (3 Suppl): 1117-20.

2. Liley A.W. Intrauterine transfusion of foetus in haemolytic disease. Br Med J. 1963; 2 (5365): 1107-9.

3. Rodeck C.H., et al. Direct intravascular fetal blood transfusion by fetoscopy in severe rhesus isoimmunisation. Lancet. 1981; 317 (8221): 625-7.

4. Altunyurt S., et al. Neonatal outcome of fetuses receiving intrauterine transfusion for severe hydrops complicated by Rhesus hemolytic disease. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012; 117 (2): 153-6.

5. Van Kamp I.L., et al. Complications of intrauterine intravascular transfusion for fetal anemia due to maternal red-cell alloimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192 (1): 171-7.

6. Konoplyannikov A.G. New technologies in the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: Autoabstract of Diss. Moscow, 2009. (in Russian)

7. Zwiers C., et al. The near disappearance of fetal hydrops in relation to current state-of-the-art management of red cell alloimmunization. Prenat Diagn. 2018; 38 (12): 943-50.

8. Degtyarev D.N., Karpova A.L., Malyutina L.V., Narogan M.V., Safarov A.A., Sen’kevich O.A., et al. Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDN): Clinical guidelines. Moscow, 2017. (in Russian)

9. De Boer I.P., et al. Pediatric outcome in Rhesus hemolytic disease treated with and without intrauterine transfusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198 (1): 54.e1-4.

10. Pasman S.A., et al. Intrauterine transfusion for fetal anemia due to red blood cell alloimmunization: 14 years experience in Leuven. Facts Views Vis ObGyn. 2015; 7 (2): 129-36.

11. Pahuja S., et al. The prevalence of irregular erythrocyte antibodies among antenatal women in Delhi. Blood Transfus. 2011; 9 (4): 388-93.

12. Osanan G.C., et al. Predictive factors of perinatal mortality in transfused fetuses due to maternal alloimmunization: what really matters? J Ma-tern Neonatal Med. 2012; 25 (8): 1333-7.

13. Deka D., et al. Perinatal survival and procedure-related complications after intrauterine transfusion for red cell alloimmunization. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016; 293 (5): 967-73.

14. Savel’yeva G.M., Kurtser M.A., Sichinava L.G., Panina O.B., Konoplyannikov A.G., Olenev A.S., et al. Rh-sensitization. Hemolytic disease of the fetus: diagnosis, treatment, prevention. Ways to reduce infant morbidity and mortality: Guidelines. Moscow, 2019. (in Russian)

15. Ivanova A.V. Health status and dynamics of hematological parameters in infants who underwent intrauterine blood transfusion for hemolytic disease by Rh factor: Autoabstract of Diss. Ekaterinburg, 2016. (in Russian)

16. Svensk Forening for Obstetrik och Gynekologi. Graviditetsimmuni-sering: Rapport No. 74. Stockholm, 2015. (in Swedish)

17. Ree I.M.C., et al. Neonatal management and outcome in alloim-mune hemolytic disease. Expert Rev Hematol. 2017; 10 (7): 607-16.

18. Ree I.M.C., et al. Are fetal bilirubin levels associated with the need for neonatal exchange transfusions in hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn? Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021; 3 (3): 100332.

19. Midlands Neonatal Guidelines. Published by the Bedside Clinical Guidelines Partnership, Staffordshire, Shropshire & Black Country Newborn and Maternity Network and Southern West Midlands Maternity and Newborn Network [Electronic resource]. NHS, 2015-2017. URL: http://www.networks.nhs.uk/nhs-networks/staffordshireshropshire-and-black-country-newborn/neonatal-guidelines

20. Millard D.D., et al. Effects of intravascular, intrauterine transfusion on prenatal and postnatal hemolysis and erythropoiesis in severe fetal isoimmunization. J Pediatr. 1990; 117 (3): 447-54.

21. Uretskaya E.V., Krogh-Jensen O.A., Lyenyushkina A.A. Fetal hemoglobin as a predictor of the intensity of postnatal hemolysis in newborns with Rh-factor hemolytic disease and a history of intrauterine blood transfusions. In: Materials of Congress XIV «Anesthesiology and Resuscitation in Obstetrics and Neonatology». Moscow, 2021.

22. Zelyanina ЕА, Khoroshkeeva O.V., Kostyukov K.V., Gasanova R.M., Belousov D.M., Bystrykh O.A., et al. Features of the cardiovascular system of fetuses and newborns after intrauterine intravascular blood transfusion. Rossiyskiy vestnik perinatologii i pediatrii [Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics]. 2021; 66 (1): 52-8. (in Russian)

23. Ivanova A.V., Zakharova S.YU., Pestryayeva L.A. Specific features of red blood cell morphology in hemolytic disease neonates undergoing intrauterine intravascular blood transfusion. Rossiyskiy vestnik perinatologii i pediatrii [Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics]. 2016; 61 (1): 42-5. (in Russian)

24. Maisels M.J., McDonagh A.F. Phototherapy for neonatal jaundice. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358 (9): 920-8.

25. Al-Alaiyan S., Al Omran A. Late hyporegenerative anemia in neonates with rhesus hemolytic disease. J Perinat Med. 1999; 27 (2): 112-5.

26. Thorp J.A., et al. Hyporegenerative anemia associated with intrauterine transfusion in rhesus hemolytic disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 165 (1): 79-81.

27. Rath M.E.A., et al. Top-up transfusions in neonates with Rh hemolytic disease in relation to exchange transfusions. Vox Sang. 2010; 99 (1): 65-70.

28. Lindenburg I.T., et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome after intrauterine transfusion for hemolytic disease of the fetus/newborn: the LOTUS study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206 (2): 141.e1-8.

29. Keir A., et al. How to use: the direct antiglobulin test in newborns. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2015; 100 (4): 198-203.

30. Gomella T.L. Neonatology: Management, Procedures, On-Call Problems, Diseases, and Drugs. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Medical Publishing Division, 2018: 905-15.

31. Polin R.A., Spitcer A.R. Secrets of Neonatology and perinatology. Eds by N.N. Volodin. Moscow: Binom. 2011: 345-58. (in Russian)

32. Gleason C.A., Juul S.E. Avery’s Diseases of the Newborn. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2018: 1165-8.

33. Hansen A.R., Eichenwald E.C. Stark A.R., Martin C.R. Cloherty and Stark’s Manual of Neonatal Care. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer, 2016: 336-52.

34. Sinha S., Miall L., Jardine L. Essential Neonatal Medicine. 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2018: 338 p.

All articles in our journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0 license)

CHIEF EDITOR
CHIEF EDITOR
Degtyarev Dmitriy Nikolaevich
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Deputy Director for Scientific Research of the V.I. Kulakov Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology National Medical Research Center of Ministry of Healthсаre of the Russian Federation, Head of the Chair of Neonatology at the Clinical Institute of Children's Health named after N.F. Filatov, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Chairman of the Ethics Committee of the Russian Society of Neonatologists, Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID iD 0000-0001-8975-2425

Journals of «GEOTAR-Media»