References
1. Michiue T., Ishikawa T., Oritani S., Kamikodai Y., Tsuda K., Okazaki S., et al. Forensic pathological evaluation of postmortem pulmonary CT high-density areas in serial autopsy cases of sudden cardiac death. Forensic Sci Int. 2013; 232 (1–3): 199–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.07.025
2. Egger C., Vaucher P., Doenz F., Palmiere C., Mangin P., Grabherr S. Development and validation of a postmortem radiological alteration index. The RA-index. Int J Legal Med. 2012; 126 (4): 559–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-012-0686-6
3. Buris L., Torocsik I., Poczkodi S. Is the aeration of the lungs a reliable sign of live birth? Z Rechtsmed. 1979; 83 (4): 303–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01882176
4. Haberda A. Zur Frage des Beweiswerthes der Lungenprobe. Arch Gynakol. 1902; 67 (1): 276–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01950913
5. Nolte G. Untersuchungen uber die Bedeutung des Rontgenbildes als Lebensprobe in der gerichtlich-medizinischen Praxis. Dtsch Z Ges Gerichtl Med. 1938; 30 (2–3): 116–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01754200
6. Ungar E. Die Bedeutung der Lebensproben und im Speciellen der Magendarmprobe. Arch Pathol Anat. 1891; 125 (1): 1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01970292
7. Brittain R.P. The hydrostatic and similar tests of live birth: a historical review. Med Leg J. 1963; 31: 189–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002581726303100404
8. Grosse Ostendorf A.L., Rothschild M.A., Muller A.M., Banaschak S. Is the lung floating test a valuable tool or obsolete? A prospective autopsy study. Int J Legal Med. 2013; 127 (2): 447–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-012-0727-1
9. Oyake Y., Aoki T., Shiotani S., Kohno M., Ohashi N., Akutsu H., et al. Postmortem computedtomography for detecting causes of sudden death in infants and children. retrospective review of cases. Radiat Med. 2006; 24 (7): 493–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-006-0061-y
10. Michiue T., Ishikawa T., Kawamoto O., Sogawa N., Oritani S., Maeda H. Postmortem CT investigation of air/gas distribution in the lungs and gastrointestinal tracts of newborn infants. a serial case study with regard to still-and live birth. Forensic Sci Int. 2013; 226 (1–3): 74–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.12.011
11. Arthurs O.J., Hutchinson J.C., Sebire N.J. Current issues in postmortem imaging of perinatal and forensic childhood deaths. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2017; 13 (1): 58–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-016-9821-x
12. Guddat S.S., Gapert R., Tsokos M., Oesterhelweg L. Proof of live birth using postmortem multislice computed tomography (pmMSCT) in cases of suspected neonaticide. advantages of diagnostic imaging compared to conventional autopsy. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2013; 9 (1): 3–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-012-9361-y
13. Barber J.L., Sebire N.J., Chitty L.S., Taylor A.M., Arthurs O.J. Lung aeration on post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging is a usefulmarker of live birth versus stillbirth. Int J Legal Med. 2015; 129 (3): 531–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1125-7
14. Hitschmann F., Lindenthal O. Zur Frage der Verwerthbarkeit der Lungenschwimmprobe bei Keimgehalt der Uterushohle. Arch Gynakol. 1902; 66 (2): 350–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01671646
15. Michiue T., Ishikawa T., Kawamoto O., Sogawa N., Oritani S., Maeda H. Postmortem CT investigation of air/gas distribution in the lungs and gastrointestinal tracts of newborn infants. a serial case study with regard to still-and live birth. Forensic Sci Int. 2013; 226 (1–3): 74–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.12.011
16. Sogawa N., Michiue T., Ishikawa T., Kawamoto O., Oritani S., Maeda H. Postmortem volumetric CT data analysis of pulmonary air/gas content with regard to the cause of death for investigating terminal respiratory function in forensic autopsy. Forensic Sci Int. 2014; 241: 112–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.05.012
17. Ruder T.D., Hatch G.M., Siegenthaler L., Ampanozi G., Mathier S., Thali M.J., et al. The influence of body temperature on image contrast in post mortem MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81 (6): 1366–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.062